U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGES GONE WILD
It's not just a threat to democracy; it's an urgent crisis that demands our immediate attention and swift action. The situation is dire, and we cannot afford to delay our response.
Low-level Federal (U.S. District Court) Judges are overstepping their bounds, inserting themselves into Executive Branch prerogatives and Constitutional responsibilities to obstruct the Trump administration's objectives. This misuse of power is not just a concern; it's a grave injustice. This urgent situation demands our immediate attention, and the intervention of the United States Supreme Court is not just crucial but vital and urgent in this regard. These actions, which are well beyond their generally accepted powers and duties, cannot continue.
The 2024 Presidential Election was not just a turning point but a defining moment for the future of our nation, a moment that carries immense weight and impact. The parallels to past pivotal moments in our history are striking, underscoring the gravity and seriousness of our current situation and the urgent need for action.
On March 14, 2025, President Trump spoke at the Department of Justice, calling out the "communist" federal persecution of conservatives. 1
"They tried to turn America into a corrupt communist and Third World country, but in the end, the thugs failed, and the truth won. Freedom won, justice won, democracy won, and the American people won," Trump said. 2
"There could be no more heinous betrayal of American values than to use the law to terrorize the innocent and reward the wicked." and stated a "corrupt group of hacks and radicals" in the federal government "weaponized the vast powers of our intelligence and law enforcement agencies to try and thwart the will of the American people." 3
"Our predecessors turned this Department of Justice into the Department of Injustice," Trump stated. "But I stand before you today to declare that those days are over, and they will never come back." 4
President Trump stated Federal agents "targeted patriotic parents at a school board meeting" as domestic terrorists treated traditional Catholics, similarly, let supporters of Antifa and Hamas walk free, and jailed "elderly Christians and pro-life activists," Trump noted. Meanwhile, federal officials "imported illegal alien murderers, drug dealers, and child predators from all over the world." 5
President Trump's comments proved prophetic. For the last eight years, the American public has been subject to the most extensive disinformation and weaponization lawfare campaign ever perpetuated by their government against one person, President Donald Trump.
"Lawfare" is a term for using legal systems and principles to achieve a political end. In this case, it refers to the strategic use of lawsuits and legal challenges, often without merit, to obstruct the Trump administration's policies and objectives. This tactic, known as "lawfare," has been used extensively against the Trump administration, and its implications are profound.
The complicit media has been covering up the most comprehensive Machiavellian Conspiracy plan ever devised, the Russian Hoax Conspiracy. This Conspiracy, which falsely alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, was initiated and planned at the highest levels of Government by President Obama and his Administration, the Democratic National Committee (DNC), Hillary Clinton, and legacy media. Then, they continued the Conspiracy plan under Biden and his Administration by weaponizing warfare to destroy Trump in transforming America into a Marxist utopia. 6
In the Special Council (SC) Durham finding report, Sussman Indictment, and Danchenko Indictment, SC Durham meticulously established a prima facie conspiracy case, demonstrating the commission of all elements of the Crime of Conspiracy under 18 USC 371, implicating the Obama Administration's attempt to defraud the American public by interfering in the 2016 Presidential election.
The findings of the Durham report confirmed that the Government had no evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion. The conclusions noted that the Obama administration fabricated the Russian collusion narrative as part of a well-designed conspiracy plan. This plan was initiated by Hillary Clinton and the DNC and approved by Obama and Biden, implicating them in the Crime of the Century, the Conspiracy to destroy a duly elected President by interfering in the 2016 Presidential election.
The Russian Hoax conspiracy was a calculated ploy by the Obama administration, Hillary Clinton, and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to deceive the public and undermine the credibility of then Presidential Candidate Trump and his team. This deliberate act, promoted with the aid of a complicit media, underscores the profound legal implications of such actions and the gravity of the deception. It's a betrayal of the highest order.
The Obama administration continued the agreement after Trump was elected President by establishing the formation of the resistance movement within the Federal Bureaucracy and the weaponization and politicization of the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Intelligence Community (IC) by weaponizing Lawfare to obstruct the Trump Presidency in rigging the 2020 Presidential election. The Biden administration continued the conspiratorial agreement using the Lawfare Stalin-Beria theory of "Show Me the Man, I Will show you the crime," which suggests that a person can be found guilty of a crime not because they have committed it but because they are a political enemy. This theory was used to prevent Trump from running for President in the 2024 election but failed.
There is no longer any doubt that this was a planned conspiracy to interfere with our election system in three Presidential elections. The Obama and Biden administrations weaponized and politicized the DOJ, FBI, and the IC, as evidenced by using the bogus Russian hoax to interfere in the 2016 election, continued the election interference by rigging the 2020 election, and tried to destroy Trump using Lawfare in the 2024 election. 7
Now that the Democrats and their surrogates have no power in the Federal Government as Republicans control the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives, they have resorted to the last desperate measures of using Lawfare by selectively choosing the courts and judges who are perceived to be politically motivated, often referred to as "activist judges," to place holds and freezes on policies that the President wants to enact. 8 9
Since Trump's inauguration, over 100 federal lawsuits have been selectively filed in court districts favorable to the Democratic party and their surrogates against the Trump administration. 10
It is arguably a continuation of the 2016 Conspiratorial agreement to transform America into a Marxist state through the weaponization of the justice system. The actions of these radical activist judges establish a pattern of Conspiracy to obstruct the Trump Presidency, the Trump agenda, and the will of the voters. One of the commonalities that connect the dots is some of the same people behind the Russian Hoax ruse, the rigging of the 2020 election, are the same people behind the weaponization of the court system, which President Trump, in his remarks, called out Marc Elias and Norm Eisen. 11
The facts show that Elias was the main person behind the various lawfare campaigns across the country to target Trump and subvert election results. 12 13
Elias surfaced in the SC Durham report as being the guy who Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee hired who contracted with Fusion GPS to invent the "Steele Dossier."
In his court filings, SC Durham describes the modus operandi, or means, of the conspiracy plan by which the Clinton campaign and DNC lawyers Michael Sussman and Marc Elias implemented the criminal conspiracy scheme. First, they paid a technology company to create falsified documents, white papers, and data files, purporting a secret communications channel between the Trump organization and the Russian-connected Alfa Bank. 14 15
Secondly, they used this technology company to penetrate Trump Tower, the Trump NY apartment, and the White House server. Thirdly, they provided the information to Steele.
President Trump also decried Norm Eisen and his group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). CREW backed the attempt to kick Trump off Colorado's ballot in 2024, and Eisen's other groups have been engaging in anti-Trump Lawfare nationwide.
"He's been after me for nine years," Trump said. "He's been vicious and violent."
Approximately 30 of the 100 lawsuits relate to Trump's immigration policies, while more than 20 of the cases directly challenge the actions of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. Ten of the cases challenge Trump's policies regarding transgender people, and more than 20 cases oppose the President's unilateral changes to federal funding, government hiring, the structure of agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and U.S. National Security and foreign policy of sending Criminal aliens back to their countries of origin. 16
These actions have led to partisan judges in blue states issuing court orders, hindering President Trump's authority as Chief Executive to root out waste, fraud, and abuse from the Federal Bureaucracy and adversely impacting U.S. National security foreign policy. The urgency of this situation cannot be overstated.
These court rulings by Federal District Court Judges to limit President Trump's authority under Article II set up the Constitutional separation of power crisis, pitting Article Two versus Article Three. Article II addresses the federal Government's executive power, including the President's power as commander in chief. Article III addresses the federal Government's judicial power.
The Constitutional question is, where in the Constitution is it stated that a single district court judge has the Constitutional authority to bind the nation to seize power from the Executive Branch to compel the Executive Branch of Government to comply with their orders that impact the President's ability to carry out his duties as defined under Article II of the Constitution?
The primary concern is that these orders from the U.S. District Courts encroach on constitutional Executive Authority, apparent from a plain reading of the Constitution.
President Trump has stated that he will follow the rule of law. However, when these orders hinder the President from carrying out his agenda promptly, wherein delays adversely impact the nation, it may be time for President Trump to reverse the order of the appellate process in the Federal court system.
When the Constitution's plain reading authorizes action by the Executive Branch, the opposing side should be appealing—at least when a politically motivated U.S. District Court seeks to handcuff or micromanage the Executive Branch.
Suppose the Supreme Court declines to hear Trump's emergency appeal asking for the court to address the lack of authority of a District Court Judge order binding on all the other states on a nationwide injunction.
Is it time for President Trump to defy these federal District courts, considering telling the U.S. district courts that they don't have constitutional authority to issue sweeping orders that block policies nationwide as the Executive Branch cannot properly perform its functions if any judge anywhere can enjoin every presidential action everywhere?
The Executive Branch will ignore their rulings unless the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) rules otherwise "on the merits of the case or matter."
It is what the Left and the media want so they can construct the false narrative that they are saving democracy, and that Trump is a dictator who has no respect for the rule of law by defying district court orders and creating a Constitutional crisis.
When the truth is that it was the Obama and Biden administrations and the Democratic establishment and their surrogates who weaponized the justice system and the courts to carry out their conspiracy plan over the last eight years to destroy Trump by interfering in three Presidential elections and now using Lawfare by cherry-picking/forum shopping in perceived liberal jurisdictions across the country to create this constitutional crisis, it is not just significant; it's staggering. It should underscore the gravity of the situation and the need for SCOTUS to take action.
To this day, no one in the Government, including Special Counsels Mueller and Durham, has thoroughly investigated the origins of Hillary Clinton-DNC Obama-Biden's designed conspiracy plan to destroy Trump by interfering in our election systems through the lens of a conspiracy investigation, which usually follows the evidence to its logical conclusion. The lack of transparency in this matter is alarming and should be a cause for concern for all Americans.
By ignoring these district court orders, President Trump, acting under his authority under Article II of the Constitution, forces the Supreme Court to step in and tell these District Courts that they cannot politically thwart the Executive Branch from acting within its apparent authority unless the Supreme Court says it is wrong on the particular issue.
The arguable actual "bad guy" in this scenario is SCOTUS, which allows this charade to continue. On its face and from a common-sense perspective, this gross deviation from how the law should work cannot continue, as the American people are sick and tired of the two-tier system of justice that uses legal warfare to ignore the will of the voters.
The Supreme Court must exercise its authority to end this unconstitutional ploy of judge-shopping, issuing stay orders, and conflict of interest under 28 U.S. Code § 455—Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the District Court Judges involved, showing personal animus and bias.
Some of these District Court judges have a conflict-of-interest issue, showing animus toward Trump or supporters of the Democratic party, which needs to be addressed by the Supreme Court. It is not just a matter of legality but a fundamental issue of the balance of power in our government. If the Constitution and the Rule of Law matter, it's time for the Supreme Court to ACT TO END this overstep by the Federal judiciary. Failure to act will erode the public trust in the Constitution.
It is not suggested that President Trump defy the decisions of the Supreme Court like President Biden explicitly did with respect to the Supreme Court's decision on student debt cancellations, but rather only defy the order of the district court based on their clearly acting outside their Constitutional Lane by encroaching on the authority of the Executive Branch.
References and Citations
https://thefederalist.com/2025/03/14/trump-slams-communist-persecution-of-conservatives-while-speaking-at-doj/
https://thefederalist.com/2025/03/14/trump-slams-communist-persecution-of-conservatives-while-speaking-at-doj/
https://thefederalist.com/2025/03/14/trump-slams-communist-persecution-of-conservatives-while-speaking-at-doj/
https://thefederalist.com/2025/03/14/trump-slams-communist-persecution-of-conservatives-while-speaking-at-doj/
https://thefederalist.com/2025/03/14/trump-slams-communist-persecution-of-conservatives-while-speaking-at-doj/
THE BLUEPRINT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
With over 30 years of experience as a Federal Agent and Law Enforcement Professional, I've seen the impact of government actions on The Nation. It's beyond belief to watch the absurdity of this mess, where the Nation is deceived by its government with lies, the justice system implodes, and the tools of the National Security Agencies have been weaponized…
https://conservativebrief.com/democrats-may-89493/
https://redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2020/04/29/steeles-alpha-bank-testimony-yields-first-connection-between-his-research-and-white-house-n135735
https://thefederalist.com/2025/01/15/nc-supreme-court-candidate-more-than-5k-overseas-ballots-with-no-voter-id-were-counted-illegally/
https://thefederalist.com/2024/10/29/democrat-election-meddler-marc-elias-wont-commit-to-accepting-the-results-of-the-election-if-trump-wins/
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23813490-durham-report/
Sussman Indictment | PDF (scribd.com)
[Note: This analysis was created by a former Retired DEA Supervisory Special Agent John Seaman with over 30 years’ experience conducting complex conspiracy investigations. Seaman is the co-author of an article Taliban Include Heroin Kingpins in Leadership - by Gretchen Peters and John Seaman - SpyTalk and author of Ideology and Political Correctness Trump Reality and reference in article The secret story of how America lost the drug war with the Taliban - POLITICOPOLITICO]
This is another cover up of conspiracy theorist people like yourself covering up for a convicted felon who has used his position as POTUS to strong arm America and worldwide. The Orange God's a traitor and has undermined our country and our Democracy. These judges are doing what's right by stopping this this tyrant from invoking this act.The law requires war to be formally declared which only Congress has the authority to do. Trump is actually the criminal thug that's enacting authoritarian Dictatorship. These judges are standing up against this narcissistic psychopath.
I read the entire article. It’s well laid out and hard to argue. There is no doubt that ideologues are flexing Article 3 to at a minimum interfere with the President. I can’t remember a time other than Trump’s administration where judges directly attempted to subvert a Presidents authorities. I did pass it on.