Discover more from The Rule of Law - Corruption - National Security
NOBODY GOES TO JAIL
"There will come a day when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and the truth will triumph again." -Joesph Gobbel, Minster of Propaganda-
One has to wonder how the biggest sedition conspiracy scandal in U.S. history, the Russian hoax, which originated in 2015 and continues to the present day, begs the question, why have those involved in organizing and implementing the Conspiracy not been investigated and held accountable and gone to jail?
Instead, for the last six years, the public has been deceived and betrayed by their elected officials, those in trusted government positions, and the media and big tech in covering up the seditious conspiratorial agreement of the Hillary/DNC/Obama/Biden designed plan in defrauding the public, by interfering in two POTUS elections to destroy the Trump Presidency and the MAGA movement.
Documentation from the Central Intelligence, Durham indictments, court filings, along with the release of Twitter files, Internal documents released by Republican Attorneys General Eric Schmitt of Missouri and Jeff Landry of Louisiana, and a report by the Republican Staff Report Committee on the Judiciary proves the existence of a seditious conspiratorial plan to defraud the American public in the 2016 and 2020 POTUS elections.
The CIA documents, former CIA Director Brennan notes that in September 2016, CIA investigative referral to FBI Director James Comey and Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Peter Strzok on Hillary Clinton approving “a plan concerning U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections” to distract the public from her email scandal.
The declassified note “alleges Hillary Clinton, on 26 July 2016, of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisers to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.” The declassified documents revealed that former CIA Director John Brennan briefed former President Obama on Hillary Clinton’s purported “plan” to tie then-candidate Donald Trump to Russia as “a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server” ahead of the 2016 presidential election.
These two documents establish the critical element in proving a conspiracy: the conspiratorial agreement in defrauding the public and interfering in a Presidential election.
Raises several questions for House Oversight investigators: Why did CIA Director Brennan instruct FBI Director Comey to open up four investigations on team Trump members in late July 2016 when Brennan and Comey knew the Steele dossier was a paid-for Hillary-DNC disinformation document? And The elephant in the room question is, what did President Obama know, and when did he know it regarding the FBI Crossfire Hurricane investigation and Hillary/DNC plan to influence the 2016 election using a DNC disinformation document? And why did he allow these investigations to go forward if Obama knew this was a plan by the Clinton campaign & DNC to taint Trump with Russian collusion?
The Twitter files released, and Internal documents released by Republican Attorneys General Eric Schmitt of Missouri and Jeff Landry of Louisiana are essential as their additional evidence (overt acts) proving a pattern of Conspiracy in furtherance of the original Hillary/DNC conspiratorial agreement and a continuation of that conspiratorial agreement by the Obama and Biden administrations. By implementing a massive disinformation campaign promoting the Clinton/DNC paid-for Steele dossier, illegal surveillance of President Trump and his team, and executing a gigantic social media censorship program encompassing agencies across the federal government – from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of Justice (DOJ), Department of State (DOS) to the Department of Defense (DOD) Pentagon to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to destroy the Trump Presidency and the Make America Great (MAGA) movement.
Durham describes the modus operandi or the means of the conspiracy plan of how the Clinton campaign and DNC lawyers Michael Sussman and Marc Elias implemented the criminal conspiracy scheme:
They paid a technology company to create falsified documents, white papers, and data files, purporting a secret communications channel between the Trump organization and the Russian-connected Alfa Bank.
They used this technology company to penetrate Trump Tower, the Trump NY apartment, and the White House server.
They provided the information to Steele.
Glen Simpson, founder of Fusion GPS, back in the late 2000s, conceived a legal dirty trick concept of “guilt by association,” on how opposition research” could be used against their political opposition by tying them to Russian Oligarchs and Russian government officials, giving the appearance to the public that they were colluding with the Russians.
The Clinton campaign and the DNC took Fusion GPS Glen Simpson’s opposition research idea of guilt by association by manufacturing and manipulating opposition research information for criminal purposes in defrauding the American public that Trump and members of his team were colluding with the Russians. [Note: The idea that this was just a dirty campaign trick and not illegal, as purported by the media and their pundits, is wrong: what they did was a crime!]
Additionally, the conspirators used the classification system to hide their criminality by making the Russians the responsible party to deceive the U.S. Congress and the American public by over-classification of documents of hiding information from Congress now calls into question the findings of both the Senate and Mueller reports of Russian interference in the 2016 election. Lastly, the commonality that some of the same conspirators involved in the Russia hoax were also involved in the Ukrainian impeachment hoax and the suppression of the Hunter Biden computer laptop, proving a pattern of Conspiracy.
Making the Russians the responsible party brings up two questions for House Oversight investigators; Why, in March 2016, did President Obama put U.S. National Security at risk by shutting down the CIA unit strategic Foreign Denial and Deception Committee (FDDC) responsible for countering the Russian disinformation threat that had been operating for over 30 years? And why in August 2016, did President Obama ignore warnings by the Intelligence Community of increased Russian cyber threats by issuing a stand-down order for U.S. Intelligence agencies to stand down in countering the Russian cyber-attacks?
Durham court filings and media reports conveyed the roles of two Democratic party-political operatives called “fixers” who had long ties to the Clintons, Cody Shearer, and Charles Dolan, and the part of the Brooking Institute, a Democratic party think tank. Durham filings told how Shearer and Dolan manufactured disinformation of Trump-Russian collusion and how they conspired with the Brooking Institute in disseminating the false narrative to the State Department, media, and other Federal agencies to defraud and deceive the American public.
[Note: Accordingly, Durham has established a prima facie conspiracy that has met the criminal elements for 18 U.S.C. 371.
A conspiracy to commit the offense to impair, obstruct or defeat the lawful function of the Executive Branch and means to interfere with or obstruct one of its proper government functions by deceit, craft, or trickery.
The standards included dishonest services fraud in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371, which is the general conspiracy statute where two or more people conspired to defraud the United States.
In the two indictments, Durham documented the “means” to interfere with or obstruct by deceit, craft, or trickery by the conspirators knowingly using the Shearer memo dossier and the “Steele Dossier,” in both documents, was manufactured or manipulated to deceive the American people.
The “means” also included dishonest services fraud, by the conspirators intentionally falsified FISA applications, lied to the FISC, withheld exculpatory evidence from the defense counsel and the court, manufactured crimes, and leaked classified and sensitive information to the media in furtherance of the Conspiracy to defraud the public and obstruct a Presidency.
The mere fact that President Obama and Director Brennan knew about the plan, yet CIA Director Brennan sent an electronic communication in late July 2016, asking FBI Director Comey to open up four separate counterintelligence investigations on members of Team Trump and then in December 2016, the actions of President Obama ordering the ICA review where the FBI, NSA and CIA never considered nor assessed Hillary Clinton and the DNC ties to Russia. In addition, President Obama's role in the Conspiracy continued the conspiratorial agreement of the Hillary-DNC plan by promoting a fabricated document, the ICA, after the Trump election as evidence to the public that Trump and his team colluded with the Russians.
Special Counsel Durham had two years to conduct a conspiracy investigation of those involved at the highest levels but chose not to do so. Instead, Durham’s investigative and prosecution efforts centered on conducting single-focus investigations on lying to the FBI instead of investigating the scope and extent of the Conspiracy and holding those accountable.
The Obama and Biden administrations, with a woke mob on the left with a compliant media and big tech, have done everything in their power to discredit all the tremendous investigative reporting, from uncovering the scope and extent of the Conspiracy by reporters and legal pundits, such as John Solomon, Sara Carter, Greg Jarrett, Lee Smith, Paul Sperry, Andrew McCarthy, Mollie Hemmingway, Margot Cleveland, Dan Bongino, Techo-Fog, Glen Greenwald and Matt Tabbi, many others too numerous to name in unraveling the greatest sedition conspiracy by calling their efforts conspiracy theorists. Yet, all their excellent open-source reporting and analysis of declassified documents have connected the dots that this was a well-designed conspiracy disinformation plan, not just wishful thinking conducted at the highest levels of government. Moreover, their reporting was more confirmation in showing a two-tier justice system in how systemic corruption the government has become. More importantly, exposed how that the checks and balances meant to protect the system from corruption failed.
Their investigative reporting debunked the “Big Lie Theory” of Russia, Russia, Russia hoax. [Note: The Big Lie theory’s fundamental principle is to repeat the lie repeatedly as a lie told once remains a lie but told a thousand times becomes the truth.]
Lastly, their reporting highlighted how the National Security agencies deceived the American public by using their lie and denial techniques in setting up the Russians as the responsible party. —exemplified by the 50 former intelligence in a letter a few weeks before the 2020 POTUS election, claiming that the Biden laptop was Russian disinformation when the evidence has proven that the computer belonged to Biden’s son Hunter. These 50 former intelligence officials knowingly and willfully used their former National Security positions and the public trust to deceive the American public that one could arguably say adversely impacted voters in the 2020 POTUS election by influencing voters to vote for Biden over Trump.
The bottom line is that the American public has been played as fools by Obama and Biden administrations, the media, and big tech. For example, in a recent speech at Stanford University on disinformation, former President Obama declared, “The internet is a tool. Social media is a tool. Tools don’t control us. We control them. And we can remake them.” This “control” suggested by and approved by Obama shows how Twitter and other social media sites suppressed the Hunter Biden Laptop story that impacted the election in 2020. It illustrates that the left doesn’t want to lose their ability to control the political narrative because if they do, it will also affect their plan and their ability to hang on to power. They want it both ways, where they control and censor their political opponents.
What is perplexing and troubling are AG Barr’s actions and his conflicting statements. For example, in his scope memorandum, AG Barr limited Durham’s ability to investigate the Conspiracy’s origins and the organizers of the Hillary/DNC/Obama/Biden conspiratorial agreement focusing instead on the FBI origins of the Russian probe.
[Note: AG Barr’s decision to limit Durham’s scope goes against all investigative reasoning and begs the House Oversight investigators to ask why? Conspiracy statutes are the most effective law enforcement tools in holding conspirators responsible for crimes with more significant consequences. Examples of crimes with more considerable consequences are Watergate, the dismantling of organized crime organizations, transnational criminal organizations, and international drug cartels. In unraveling complex conspiracies, the investigation begins at the origins of the conspiratorial agreement in identifying the conspirators and connecting the dots (overt acts). The statute of limitations starts with the last overt act of the Conspiracy.]
19 December 2020, AG Barr said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal that he had concluded that the CIA had “stayed in its lane” before the FBI launched its “Crossfire Hurricane” counterintelligence investigation into potential ties between President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia. Barr said he hadn’t seen “any sign of improper CIA activity” or any foreign government activity that occurred before the FBI began its probe in July 2016.
[Note: Former CIA Director John Brennan has admitted Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative; and Peter Strzok wrote the 31 July 2016 “Electronic Communication” that originated FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane.” Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief allied intelligence officials connected to the Australian Ambassador to the U.K, Alexander Downer. Peter Strzok acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI.
According to a Fox news article dated 29 July 2020 by Brooke Singman, FBI Comey and McCabe pushed for the inclusion of the Steele dossier into the body of the ICA. However, CIA Director and CIA analysts disagreed and were left out and put into Annex A. FBI Assistant Director McCabe stated that the FBI wanted the Dossier included in the body of the ICA because President Obama wanted all FBI information contained in the ICA.
A source said that in 2019, they found two cell phones while searching Mifsud’s London apartment. The source claims the authority turned over the two cell phones to Durham and Congressman Nunes. Additionally, during AG Barr and Durham’s fact-finding trip to Italy in October 2019, Mifsud’s Lawyer provided a tape to Barr and Durham indicating Mifsud was a western intelligence operative to run an FBI/CIA operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. If the above information is accurate, it refutes Barr’s claim that the CIA stayed in its lane.
Raises the questions for Congressional House investigators: Why did CIA Director Brennan instruct FBI Director Comey to open up four investigations on team Trump members in late July 2016 when Brennan and Comey knew the Steele dossier was a paid-for Hillary-DNC disinformation document? And Why did President Obama allow the FBI investigations to go forward if Obama knew this was a plan by the Clinton campaign and DNC to taint Trump with Russian collusion?]
18 May 2000, AG Barr commented in a FOX news article that he does not expect the Justice Department’s review of the origins of the Obama administration’s Trump-Russia probe to lead to a criminal investigation of former President Obama or former Vice President Joe Biden. Barr stating “There’s a difference between an abuse of power and a federal crime. Not every abuse of power, no matter how outrageous, is necessarily a federal crime.
[Note: The documents refute AG Barr’s statement by establishing the involvement of Presidents Obama and Biden in the Hillary/DNC/Obama/Biden conspiratorial agreement.]
The prevailing thought among the media and legal commentators is that the statute of limitations for Conspiracy has run out on Durham, holding those accountable in the biggest corruption coup scandal in U.S. history.
In a commentary piece for the Washington Examiner on 3 November 2022, former Attorney General (AG) Bill Barr said there would be no FBI accountability after the Russian gate debacle. Barr’s comments raise serious questions about why there is no accountability when the DOJ, under AG Barr’s watch, had two years to conduct a conspiracy investigation of those involved at the highest levels but chose not to do so.
Sean Hannity’s radio show on 6 October 2022 brought this notion to the forefront as a caller asked Hannity if Durham would ever hold those involved in the coup scandal accountable. Hannity responded by telling the caller and his audience that the statute of limitations on those involved had run out and that they had gotten away with it.
I found both Barr’s and Hannity’s comments and media pundits’ analyses promoting this thought that the statute of limitations for Conspiracy has run out and that no one involved in the coup will be held accountable to be the opposite of my two-year research analysis of the Trump-Russian collusion hoax.
There is still a pathway to hold those accountable if those in elected office dare to do so. The Statute of Limitations for the Conspiracy doesn’t expire until October 2025.
When someone in government does something terrible, they cannot get away with it. So, you give people a voice. You hold guilty people accountable. Nothing else matters; letting people get away with it dictates the government we deserve. Transparency is through the freedom of the press. However, the problem is that we have corrupted media.
The two significant issues for the House Oversight Committee are the Trump-Russian Collusion Hoax and the weaponization and politicalizing of the National Security Agencies by the Obama and Biden Administrations, are intertwined.
The House Oversight investigators need to ask SC Durham why he didn’t conduct a conspiracy investigation in following the investigative leads in following the evidence to its logical conclusions.
By not pursuing or conducting a conspiracy investigation, Durham has left the nation in a significant predicament; how will those involved in the greatest corruption scandal ‘The Trump Russian Hoax” Conspiracy, ever be held accountable in a court of law?
Durham’s failure directly concerns the Rule of Law and the American people’s trust in the justice system. Are we a nation of laws where no one is above the law, or has our justice system become so corrupted that the Rule of law no longer matters?
This article’s purpose is to make the public aware of the last six years of the disinformation messaging campaign by the compliant media cartel of deceiving and confusing the public as to the threat to their freedoms by the power of the State. Here is a list of questions every American needs to ponder:
Before voting in the 2024 POTUS election, ask yourself does the Rule of Law matter?
Secondly, what is the alternative if the Rule of Law doesn’t matter? Chaos, Anarchy, or mob rule?
You, the voter, have the power of your vote to stop the corruption of our government institutions by electing officials who will restore the public trust in the Rule of Law.
Are you fed up with lies and the unconstitutional, morally reprehensible, and probable criminal acts (revealed by SC Durham Investigation) committed by an entrenched group of individuals who have politically weaponized nearly the entire federal national security apparatus?
Or are you satisfied with the current government policies and the direction of the Country?
The house republicans, in congressional oversight hearings, have an excellent opportunity to get the answers to these questions the public deserves in a search for the truth so the voters in 2024 can determine the direction of the Country:
The next President will still have a pathway to hold those accountable if those in elected office dare to do so. The Statute of Limitations for the Conspiracy doesn’t expire until October 2025.
Lastly, how do we move forward as a country in restoring the public trust in the Rule of Law if no one is held accountable or goes to jail for their criminal actions in the greatest conspiracy scandal in U.S. history?
[Note: All the information presented in this article is reference in the below listed sub stack articles.]
DURHAM INVESTIGATION-ANSWERING THE “5 W’S AND THE HOW” QUESTIONS IN THE BIGGEST FRAUD EVER PERPETRATED ON THE AMERICAN PUBLIC AND WORST INTELLIGENCE BETRAYAL IN UNITED STATES HISTORY PART 1 OF 2 (substack.com)
DURHAM INVESTIGATION-ANSWERING THE 5 W's AND THE HOW QUESTIONS IN THE BIGGEST FRAUD EVER PERPERTRATED ON THE AMERICAN PUBLIC AND WORST INTELLIGENCE BETRAYAL IN UNITED STATES HISTORY PART 2 OF 2 (substack.com)
EXPOSING THE "BIG LIE," IN THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT (ICA) REPORT-2017- RUSSIA’s INFLUENCE CAMPAIGN TARGETING THE 2016 US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION (substack.com)
CALL TO ACTION-STOP THE GREATEST THREAT TO OUR CONSTITUTION: THE POLITICAL WEAPONIZATION AND CORRUPTION OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCIES BY THE OBAMA AND BIDEN ADMINISTRATIONS (substack.com)
WILL THE DURHAM INVESTIGATION RESULT IN A WHITEWASH DESPITE EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY? (substack.com)
WHAT IS THE OPPOSITE OF THE RULE OF LAW? CHAOS-ANARCHY? (substack.com)
LEGAL GOVERNMENT RESET - by John Seaman (substack.com)
[Note: This article was created by a former Retired DEA Supervisory Special Agent John Seaman with over 30 years’ experience conducting complex conspiracy investigations. Seaman is the co-author of an article Taliban Include Heroin Kingpins in Leadership - by Gretchen Peters and John Seaman - SpyTalk and author of Ideology and Political Correctness Trump Reality and reference in article The secret story of how America lost the drug war with the Taliban - POLITICOPOLITICO]