CENSORED
Elon Musk and the Congressional Oversight Committee, are you paying attention?
I never planned on writing an article about Censorship, but after finding out last week, the postings of my sub-stack articles on Twitter now come with a Warning Label. So, I know now how all those professional medical doctors who tried to warn the nation about the origins of COVID and the adverse side effects of the COVID vaccines were censored and silenced.
The problem with a Warning Label by Twitter is it paints the author with a broad brush that insinuates the contents of the article are potentially spammy or unsafe, accusing the author of misleading people or disrupting the reader experience, that the contents are violent or deceptive, that could lead to real-world harm and that the categories posted are a direct violation of the Twitter rules.
Besides the warning label, Twitter censors provide no further explanation or specifics on how the article’s contents violate Twitter rules.
The timing of this could not come at a better time, as this illustrates the principal issue before the Congress Oversight Committee on how the Tech platforms are censuring information of great interest to the public from the public learning the truth.
I spent my whole professional life upholding the Rule of Law. My expertise as a Federal Agent was in conducting criminal investigations with an emphasis on conspiracies gathering the facts ensuring the evidence met the elements of the criminal statute for Federal Prosecutions in U.S. courts.
The conclusions reached in the sub-stack articles on my 30 years of investigative experience conducting complex conspiracy investigations.
After the results of the Mueller report came out in April 2019, which determined there was no Trump-Russia collusion, I began conducting my investigative analysis of the Trump-Russian collusion hoax using the same investigative approach used in “Operation Reciprocity,” to see if I could answer the million-dollar question of how a Democrat National Committee (DNC) disinformation document, the so-called Steele dossier became the centerpiece for the National Security agencies, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Department of Justice (DOJ), investigations of Trump and members of his team? [Note: Operation Reciprocity was a major DEA/DOJ narco-terrorism investigation targeting the Senior Leadership of the Taliban and the heads of the Afghan drug trafficking organizations.] 1
I reviewed the voluminous amount of open-source media reporting by comparing the information with the known facts in declassified documents and government investigative findings. The information in these sub-stacks provided a roadmap for the American public in how Durham was connecting the dots and the relevance of the information in explaining to the readers how Durham conducted his conspiracy investigations for potential Federal prosecutions.
The investigative findings were reported in the sub-stacks, which concluded that Special Counsel Durham had met all the criminal statute elements for 18 U.S.C. 371 in establishing a Conspiracy by the Conspiratorial agreement to defraud the American public by manufacturing crimes in interfering in two Presidential elections, 2016 and 2020 and obstructing the Trump Presidency.
Nowhere in the contents of these sub-stacks is there misleading information or information that is not factual or backed up with references that would promote or lead to violence. Instead, the information presented allows the reader to reach their conclusions as to the merit or truth of the data.
Since when did a search for the truth based on factual information by exposing how corrupted the justice system had become and informing the public about the threat to the nation becomes disinformation? Furthermore, who are these people making the decisions to censor people’s writings based upon what criteria and expertise? Or is it algorisms programmed by keywords that edit the information? Either way, these censorship rules need to be changed if they’re going to be an exchange of information for public debate on the truth of the matter.
This Censorship by Big Tech on behalf of the state illustrates the threat and problem the nation is facing when those in power no longer trust the average citizen with the truth. The main salient point of this article is when did the government think it had the right to hide the fact from the American public? If they can censor people like me and other professionals who spent their careers in their chosen fields and became experts by censoring or suppressing our information, then were all in trouble.
Testimony of Michael Shellenberger and Matt Taibbi, the Twitter File messengers, illustrates this salient point by exposing the suppression and Censorship by the government, Big Tech, and the media. Yet, during their Congressional testimony, they were attacked by Democratic members of Congress on the Oversight Committee defending Censorship by the government. 2
Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels said it the best and was the master in turning words into a weapon of mass destruction, “The Big Lie Theory.”
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. Therefore, the lie can be maintained only for such time as the state can shield the people from the political, economic, and military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the state to use all its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus, by extension, the truth is the state’s greatest enemy.” 3
How prophetic have Gobbels comments come true today when the Prosecutors in New York City have indicted a former President based upon their theories of Show me the man, I will show you the crime.
Today our country faces a deadly storm where the search for the truth is under attack; hiding evidence and lying has become the new standard in replacing the facts in the public domain. You can’t have Justice if you’re relying on lies.
These censored sub-stack articles aim to warn all Americans of the five-alarm fire alarm that our country’s house is on fire and, by ignoring the fire, will destroy the whole foundation of our country’s legal and Judicial structure.
In closing, the significance of the information in this article is that this is about your civil liberties in awakening the nation as to the perils of government tyranny and that there is a deep state within the government that threatens our nation’s liberties as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
Here is the question for every American and elected official, how do we move forward as a country in restoring the public trust and faith in the Justice system if there is no accountability for those who organized the most significant sedition coup in American history, the Russian hoax?
References and Citations
The secret story of how America lost the drug war with the Taliban - POLITICO
‘Twitter Files’ Taibbi and Shellenberger testify before Congress - Deseret News
[Note: This article was created by a former Retired DEA Supervisory Special Agent John Seaman with over 30 years’ experience conducting complex conspiracy investigations. Seaman is the co-author of an article Taliban Include Heroin Kingpins in Leadership - by Gretchen Peters and John Seaman - SpyTalk and author of Ideology and Political Correctness Trump Reality and reference in article The secret story of how America lost the drug war with the Taliban - POLITICOPOLITICO]